Showing posts with label Brahmasūtra. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Brahmasūtra. Show all posts

Jan 1, 2011

AN INSIGHT INTO THE ORIGIN OF THE VEDIC CONCEPT OF BRAHMA

01. INTRODUCTION
Strictly speaking, the concept of Brahma was not included in the original concept of the Aryan people. Their worship was mainly directed to Varuṇa along with Agni and Mitra before it branched into Mazdayasnians (Monotheists) and Devayasnians (Polytheists). An examination of the good deities as preached by Zarathustra and a glance through the hymn XI, 6 Prayer for deliverance from calamity, addressed to the entire pantheon of Atharvaveda are pointers to ascertain the influence of the Natural Forces in the early religions of the Āryan folk.
02  . THE CREATION OF THE WORLD BY AHURA-MAZDA AND CORRESPONDING EVILS BY ANGRO MAINYUS
Ahura-Mazda spake unto Spitama Zarathustra, saying:
“I have made every land dear to its dwellers, even though it had no charms whatever in it. Had I not made every land dear to its dwellers, even though it had no charms whatever in it, then the whole living world would have invaded the Airyana Vaêgô.”
COUNTRIES AND LANDS CREATED CORRESPONDING EVILS PLACED THERE BY
BY AHURA-MAZDA.                                    ANGRO MAINYUS (THE EVIL SPIRIT).
1. Airyana Vaêgô by the good river Dâitya.    1. The serpent and winter.
2. The plains of Sughdha.                                 2. The fly Skaitya, which stings
                                                                           and brings death to the cattle.
3. The land of Mourn (Merv).                             3. Sinful lusts.
4. Bâkhdhi with high-lifted banners (Balkh).    4. Corn-eating ants.
5. The land of Nisâya.                                        5. The sin of unbelief.
6. Harôyu with its lakes (Herat).                       6. The stained mosquito.
7. Vaêkereta (Cabul).                                        7. The Pairika Knāthaiti (meaning
                                                                             an evil creature or a pari who
                                                                               destroys mankind)
8. Urva of the rich pastures (land in Khorasan). 8. The sin of pride and tyranny.
9. Khnenta in Vehrkâna.                                     9. Unnatural sin.
10. Harahvaiti the beautiful.                                10. Sin of defiling the virgin earth
                                                                                  by burying corpses.
11. The bright and glorious Haêtumant.           11. Witchcraft and wizards.
12. Ragha of the three races                             12. Sin of utter unbelief (atheism).
      (Rai, the birthplace of Zoroaster).
13. Holy Kakhra.                                                13. Sin of burning of corpses.
14. The four-cornered Varena.                        14. Illness of women.
15. Country of the Seven Rivers.                     15. Excessive heat.
16. The land by the floods of the Rangha.      16. Excessive frost.
“There are still other lands and countries, beautiful and deep, desirable and bright and thriving.”
03. WHO ARE DAITYAS OR ASURAS? WHO ARE PANIS?
There is a common misconception that Zarathustra, having admitted various superstitious powers both good and evil as existing cannot be said to be a promoter of monotheism. The answer for this question is that Zarathustra’s good and evil are various natural phenomena only. But the list gives a few tools for the interpretations of a few historical facts, the most important among which is the existence of a good river named Dâitya. Daitya is the common name given in the Vedas to the foes of the Devas. Thus these Daityas might have once inhabited the river valleys of Daitya. Other names equivalent to Daitya are Asura and Pai. The very Zarathustrian God Ahura can be a synonym of the word Asura. Thus the abode of the Asuras or Daityas is undoubtedly Persia. The name Paini of the celebrated Sanskrit grammarian also means the offspring of Pai.  it is accepted fact that Paṇini belonged to a village in the Sindhu delta of present Pakistan. Thus Paṇis most probably could be the Dravidian people pertaining to Indus Valley Civilization, which later was destroyed by the Aryan people through a series of raids within a span of a few centuries, which, of course, an agrarian settlement in no case can survive. There is, therefore, no merit in the averment that the South Indians are the offsprings of the ancient Asuras or Daityas.
04. THE VEDIC PANTHEON
The following deities are praised in hymn. XI, 6. Prayer for deliverance from calamity, addressed to the entire pantheon of the Atharvaveda
1. Agni, the trees, the plants, the herbs, Indra, Bṛhaspati, and Sūrya
2. Varuṇa, Mitra, Viṣṇu, Bhaga,  Amśa and Vivasvant
3. Savitar, Dhātar, Pūṣan, Tvaṣṭar
4. Gandharvas , Apsarases, Aśvins and to Brahmaṇaspati, and Āryamān
5. Sūrya, Candramas, the twain and the Ādityas
6. Vāta (wind) Parjanya, the atmosphere, the directions of space and all the regions
7. Day and night, Uṣas, and Soma (Candramas)
8. The animals of the earth and of heaven, the wild beasts of the forest, and the winged birds
9. Bhava and Sarva, Rudra and Paśupati
10. The heavens, stars, earth, Yakshas, mountains, seas, rivers, and lakes
11. The seven Ṛṣis, the divine waters, Prajāpati, the Fathers with Yama at their head
12. The gods that dwell in heaven, in the atmosphere and the mighty (gods) upon the earth
13. The Ādityas, Rudras, Vasus, the divine Atharvans in heaven, and the wise Aṅgiras
14. The sacrifice and the sacrificer, the ṛks, the sāmans, and the healing (Atharvan) charms, the yajus-formulas and the invocations (to the gods)
15. The five kingdoms of the plants with soma the most excellent among them, the Darbha-grass, hemp, and mighty barley
16. The Arāyas (demons of grudge), Rakṣas, serpents, pious men, Fathers and the one and a hundred deaths
17. The seasons we speak, the lords of the seasons, the sections of the year, the half years, years, and months
18. gods from the south, the west,  the east and the north
05. HISTORICITY AND NEED OF A BRAHMAN CONCEPT
Unlike the Zarathustrian Universal Souls representing natural phenomena, the Vedic pantheon by nature is Polytheistic, but it does not hide its affinity to the worship of natural phenomena, revealing its common origin with the Persian monotheism. But such common aspects did not act between these two major religions as a harmonizing factor. Instead they fostered common hatred to each other until and after the followers of the Vedic religion were gradually driven and banished out of the Iranian Plate. The unfortunate victims then warred against the Paṇis and after suppressing and victimizing those people as slaves, expanded their control to the East and South and controlled the entire defeated by a social system evolved by them by continuous attacks and a synthesis of cultural identities for the greatest period the world ever has known the slavery of an entire nation; suffice it to say that the process of this existential issue brought forth resistance not only by using weapons but also by a tsunami of intellectual endeavors founding a strong philosophical background capable of promoting both liberty for the able and slavery for the meek. The basic concept of this philosophy was an undefined variable named Brahma.
06. THE KEYS TO BRAHMAN
Thus we are now forced to study the evolution of the concept of Brahma. The key words to Brahma are found in the Vedic literature itself, though with a floating and plastic nature in its application, usage and meaning. The seers Atharvan and Brahman of the Atharvaveda, the gods Bṛhaspati, Brahmaṇaspati, the creator god Brahman, the abstract concept Brahma, the priestly class Brāhmaṇa, the life styles and qualities like Brahmacārin, Brahma varcas, brahmacaryaṁ, Brāhmaṇyaṁ etc are the key words to study the nature of evolution of the word Brahma. However an appreciation of the evolutionary nature of the unification concepts of the original Āryan religion shall also be considered.
07. THE INCONSISTENCIES IN MONOTHEIC RELIGIONS
As the Āryan concept of Religion was Nature centered, there was no chance in its earlier phase to uphold the natural rhythm of all things. In Zend Avesta, Ahura Mazda tells “You shall therefore hearken to the Soul of Nature. Contemplate the beams of fire with a most pious mind.” The Vedic concept of Natural harmony called Ṛta is well known. As an equivalent of Ṛta, Cosmic Order in Zarathustra preaches Aṣa as, “There is only one path, the path of Aṣa, all the rest are no paths." Aṣa also denotes purity of mind and body, truth, justice and righteousness.
But the religion of Zarathustra has an internal inconsistency; which is none other than Ahura Mazda himself. Ahura Mazda in no case a natural phenomena, it is but an invention of human hallucinations and aspirations of a single but almighty God. This inconsistency is common to almost all religions supporting truth and reason within its premises. But to surpass this demerit, Zarathustra attempts to define his various names as attributes of logical conclusions fir for a monotheistic religion. But when his hatred against the polytheists which he had acquired from the declarations of many past generations of his religion, crept into his orations, Ahura Mazda is no better than a wrathful Demon.
08. THE HATRED BETWEEN THE ARYAN RELIGIONS
In Chapter I. THE PROCLAMATION OF SALVATION it is stated “I (Zarathustra) make known to Ahura-Mazda the Great God, that I am about to offer him my prayers and sacrifices. (Yasnas) He is the greatest and best, the most powerful and wise. I pay homage, also, to the bountiful immortals (the Amensha-Spentas), the guardians of the world, and to the body of the sacred cow and its soul; (i) to Ahura (Jupiter), Mithra (the sun), to the star Sirius; and to the Fravashis (guardian angels of the saints).
I declare myself to be a Mazdaist, a Zarathustrian, a sworn foe to the Daevas (2) and a worshipper of Ahura-Mazda.” It is evident from the above that earlier Āryan religion as practiced in Persia contained sacrifices, beliefs in immortals, cow worship, belief in souls and ancestors etc. It is more or less similar in Vedic religion also. But alas, the most generous among the believers of such a religion states, “I drive away the Daêvas, I profess myself a Zarathrustrian, an expeller of the Daêvas, a follower of the teachings of Ahura.” Also, “When barley is coming forth, the Daêvas start up; when corn is growing ripe, then faint the Daêvas’ hearts; when the corn is being ground, the Daêvas groan; when wheat is coming forth, the Daêvas are destroyed. In that house they can no longer stay; from that house they are beaten away, wherein wheat is thus coming forth.” Zarathustra once asked “Zarathustra asked Ahura-Mazda: “O thou all-knowing Ahura-Mazda, should I urge upon the godly man, should I urge upon the godly man, should I urge upon the godly woman, should I urge upon the wicked Daêva-worshipper who lives in sin, that they have once to leave behind them the earth made by Ahura, that they have to leave the water that runs, the corn that grows, and all the rest of their wealth?”  Another example is “They run away, the wicked, evil-doing Daêvas; they run away, casting the evil eye, the wicked, evildoing Daêvas.”
09. THE ATHARVANS AND BRAHMANS
The common name for early priests of the Āryan folk was “Atharvan” both in Persian and Vedic religions. That is how the fourth Veda was named Atharvaveda. There is no merit in the speculation that Atharvaveda is younger than Ṛgveda. There is every possibility that the contrary is true as it contains the ancient traditional medicinal and customary information which no people shall depart when writing was not common and reciting by memory was the most common practice. As far as the common man is concerned chanting a hymn on the praise of a particular God is always less important than the eradication of mosquitoes and vermin and of diseases.
When the conflict between the Monotheists and Polytheists of the Persian Āryans was settled in favor of the former, and the latter were banished, the banished had not settled their own internal differences. There upsurged two prominent clans of Brahmins namely Atharvans and the Brahmans. They are the most prominent among the seers of Atharvaveda. Atharvans practiced their ancient wizardry efficiently where as the Brahmans ventured to further the metaphysics in their religion. We do not know exactly which among the many Brahmans first introduced the concept of Brahma into their religion. Most probably it was only an ancestral God that they have introduced into religion namely Brahmaṇaspati who was equated with then existing Bṛhaspati, the preceptor of Indra. They dared to state that everything is and has originated from Brahma. Others mocked at these propagators of Brahman as jokers and gave a nickname to them as Brāhmaṇas. They would remark, “There goes the one following the path of Brahma, a Brāhmaṇa who worships his own ancestors as equal or superior to Indra.” But history proved that their foolishness brought them the most beneficial boon of predominance to their successors for more than three millenniums.
10. CAUSES OF EVOLUTION OF BRAHMAN
The evolution of the concept of Brahma was the result of a theological inquiry to unify the concept of the numerous gods, as the up-surging political power of the Aryan ranchers demanded to suppress the collective defense of the indigenous agriculturists. A creating god was necessary to include the entire pantheon into a single unit, the immediate result of which shall be the unification of the conflicting Aryan clans. Thus an anonymous Brahman philosopher introduced his ancestral God Brahmaṇaspati into the Vedic literature and an astonishing dawn of philosophical speculations followed him to blossom an abstract Indian garden of refined thought.
11. BRAHMANASPATI IN THE VEDAS
Brahmaṇaspati is mentioned in many occasions in the Ṛgveda such as 01-018 Brahmaṇaspati 1, 3, 4, 5 and 01-040 Brahmaṇaspati 1, 2,3,4,5  and 02-001 Agni 3  and 02-023 Brahmaṇaspati 1,2,3,4,9,11,19 and 02-024 Brahmaṇaspati 1, 2, 4, 5, 8,9,10,11,12, 13,14,15,16 and 02-025 Brahmaṇaspati  1, 2,3,4,5 and 02-026 Brahmaṇaspati 1,2,3,4 and 04-050 Bhaspati 8, 9 and 05-046 Viśvadevas 3 and 06-075 Weapons of War 10, 17 and 07-041 Bhaga 1 and 07-044 Dadhikras 1 and 07-097 Bhaspati 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 and 08-027 Viśvadevas 1 and 09-083 Soma Pavamāna 1 and 10-053 Agni Śaucika Gods. 9  and 10-065 Viśvadevas 1 and 10-072 The Gods 1,2,3,4,5 and 10-155 Various 1, 2 and 10-164 Dream-charm 4 and 10-173 The King 3 and 10-174 The King 1 etc. He is also praised in Atharvaveda in IV, 4 Charm to promote virility 6 and VI, 140 Expiation for the irregular appearance of the first pair of teeth 1 and XI, 9 Prayer to Arbudi and Nyarbudi for help in battle 25 and VI, 74 Charm to allay discord 1 and XI, 6 Prayer for deliverance from calamity, addressed to the entire pantheon 4 and VI, 45 Prayer against mental delinquency 3 and XIII, 1 Prayer for sovereign power addressed to the god Rohita and his female Rohinî 9, 33 and 51 etc. Let us consider the attributes of God Brahmaṇaspati next.

Dec 23, 2010

AN INTRODUCTION TO THE PHILOSOPHY OF BADARAYANA

01. Introduction
In spite of the Greek interpretations of philos and logos, philosophers throughout the world have proved that there is neither love nor science in philosophy. Hallucinations and speculations have always played great roles in the development of this precious art. Great masters such as Socrates were no exceptions in proving that they were no better than the ordinary laymen in their beliefs, whenever they dared to reveal them in love of truth. But it is an accepted fact that the philosopher class has kept its thoughts distinct from its beliefs as far as possible to uphold the superiority of pure reason; no matter whether they achieved it or not.
Even though philosophers are widely mocked at on their lack of interest in practical and tactical senses, they have contented on achievements attainable within a long lasting span of time and thereby surpassing the merit of the wealthy and the influential. The processes of inquiry set out by the philosophers to upset the ruling ideals were seldom without any consequence. Many of such inquiries sprang out of mere curiosity or love of knowledge.
Knowing a philosopher properly necessarily leads into a state where learning all others becomes unnecessary, on the ground that a proper inquiry into the thought of a complete man shall cover all basic aspects  of human aspirations. In that case, if we attempt to select an Indian philosopher as a model for such a study, we shall be sunk into an entire ocean of philosophies, but all currents therein shall lead into only one man namely Bādarāyaṇa.
02. The uniqueness of Indian Philosophy
Until the medieval centuries, the so called Indian cultural nation was considered as a region in the south of the Himalayas of the southern Asia covering areas east of Middle East up to Thailand, from Iran to Myanmar in the Modern sense. However the river Indus was the most prominent part of this civilization with solid evidences of more than a thousand decades of social life. Similarly All Indian philosophers have always appreciated unpredictability in jurisdiction and a well defined centre point in the treatment of their philosophical processes. Bādarāyaṇa on the contrary was a propagator of a methodology where facts and procedure always preceded conclusions. His aphorisms seldom contained metaphors and always were in the fifth case denoting a language of pure reasoning unless otherwise required. His definitions were perfect even in grammatical sense, his immense universe was but limited, his imagination was visionary, his averments were free and devoid of prejudice, his affinity was knowledge and his commitment was to the generations yet to be born. But his life still remains unsolved to his fans.
03. Bādarāyaṇa, the man and his time
Tradition preaches that Kṛṣṇadvaipāyana, Pārāśara, Vedavyāsa and Bādarāyaṇa are synonyms of the same prodigy. But whenever a question of evidence is raised from some corner, they answer that the name was obtained as he was either born in an island with badara (Indian jujube) trees or dwelt at Badari of the Himalayas. The only facts available are the presence of a gotra named Bādarāyaṇa gotra among the Brahmins of India, and that his name is quoted as the author of Brahmasūtra, also known as Vedānta Sūtra, Sārīraka Mīmāṁsa Sūtra and Uttara Mīmāṁsa Sūtra. But Brahmasūtra being an ancient work quoted widely by historical personalities throughout thousands of years and as a source referring to dozens of great philosophers and philosophical treatises of the time and as an evaluator of the wisdom of the Vedas and Upaniṣads, offers abundant material to ascertain pointers to the worldly life of Bādarāyaṇa.
As Bādarāyaṇa is equated with Vyāsa, it is necessary now to correct a common error associated with the dating of Mahābhārata. Either the end of the Kurukṣetra war or the death of Kṛṣṇa is commonly regarded as the starting of the Kaliyuga. But what is stated in Mahābhārata Strīparva, Section VIII is that a portion of Kali was born as Duryodhana in the womb of Gāndhāri. It is also described in detail in Strīparva, Section X, XXI, XXIV etc, that the end of the Yuga had started as early as the lamenting ladies of the Kuru household had entered in the battlefield after the entire Kauravas were slaughtered in the battlefield. Eventhough Vyāsa, Vidura and Dṛtarāṣṭra were informed about the fact by others earlier, it was Gāndhāri who realized that the Yuga had changed.
Another misconception is fixing the Yugādi according to Mahābhārata and the Yugādi as envisaged by Āryabhaṭṭa in his interpretation of Sūryasiddhānta. In verse 5 of Daśagītikā he states,
Kaho manavo ha manuyuga skha gataste ca manuyugachuna ca
Kalpāderyugapāda ga ca gurudivasacca bharatāt pūrva
The phrase bharatāt pūrvaṁ is wrongly interpreted as Mahābhāratāt pūrvaṁ. Accordingly corruption in texts were also incorporated in recent texts in the last line as
Kalpāderyugapāda ga ca gurudivasacca bhāratāt pūrva
Āryabhaṭṭa being a Jain pertaining to Aśmaka and as Aśmaka was traditionally regarded as the place where Bāhubali did penance after enthroning his brother Bharata who became the first universal emperor of Jains since the Yugādi. Bāhubali became the first saint to attain liberation in the Apasarpiṇi kāla coinciding with Kaliyuga. K. Chandra Hari has substantiated this point in his “Intricacy of Certain Verses of Āryabhaṭṭīya and Jain Tradition - Identification of Aśmaka as Śrāvaṇabelgoḷa-Camravaṭṭaṁ Jain Country” published in Indian Journal of History of Astronomy, Vol. CCX (4) 1 October 2007. However if the Yugādis were identical with a common scientific source, their correspondence would be natural. But the vedic 360 day calendar and the 365.2587523 day calendar according to Āryabhaṭṭa differ considerably. The next chance is that the Yugādi being the conjunction of all the planets including the sun in Meṣa, the first sign of the zodiac, if the Yugadi was astronomically observed physically at the time of the end of the Kurukṣetra war and if the estimation of the time of Yugādi by Āryabhaṭṭa is without fault, both may reasonably coincide. But there is no evidence for either. However the disagreement in the calculations of the 365.2587523 day of Āryabhaṭṭa and the Recent scientific 365.2563721 days, is only of 2.380232 days in 1000 years. As the Yugādi as arrived by Āryabhaṭṭa is -3101 January 23 (BC 3102 January 23, 6.00 am) approximately according to present Gregorian Calculations, or  -3101 February 18 (BC 3102 February 18, 6.00 am) as per present Julian Calendar discarding the discrepancy in the calculation of leap years from the beginning and January 1, of AD 1. But as the Yugādi represents conjunction of all the planets and as the calculations of Āryabhaṭṭa in respect of other planets are not as good as that of sun, the error is more than we shall ordinarily think. But we cannot blame him because he has surpassed all other astronomers of his time. Hence an approximation of the time of Kurukṣetra war, if at all it has actually occurred based on the Yugādi, if no other evidence could be gathered on the contrary.
Hence by going after Mahābhārata and Āryabhaṭṭa we cannot go beyond any speculations. The next possibility is the authors and texts quoted by Bādarāyaṇa. There is specific mentioning of the names of Kāśakṛtsna(1.4.22 Śaṇkara), Audulomi (1.4.21, 3.4.45, 4.4.6 Śaṇkara), Bādari (1.2.30, 3.1.11, 4.3.7, 4.4.10 Śaṇkara),  Jaimini (1.2.28, 1.2.31, 1.3.31, 1.4.18, 3.2.40, 3.4.2, 3.4.18, 3.4.40, 4.3.12, 4.4.5, 4.4.11 Śaṇkara), Āśmarathya (1.2.29, 1.4.20 Śaṇkara), Atreya (3.4.44 Śaṇkara) and Kārṣṇājini (3.1.9 Śaṇkara). Śuka (1.3.34 Śaṇkara), Caitraratha (1.4.35 Śaṇkara) etc may not necessarily denote a name.  Brahmasūtra refers Bādarāyaṇa himself in many occasions mainly to uphold his theorems (1.3.26, 1.3.33, 3.2.41, 3.4.1, 3.4.8, 3.4.19, 4.3.15, 4.4.7, 4.4.12 Śaṇkara). Kāśakṛtsna is a well known pre Pāṇinian grammarian also. In Kathā Saritsāgara, Vararuci tells a story of two preceptor brothers Varṣa and Upavarṣa as “Now in course of time Varsha got a great number of pupils, and among them there was one rather stupid pupil of the name of Panini” Upavarṣa, the brother of the preceptor Varṣa of Pāṇini according to Kathā Saritsāgara has commented on both Pūrvamīmāṁsa Sūtra of Jaimini and the Brahmasūtra of Bādarāyaṇa. Hence it can be assumed that Bādarāyaṇa flourished between the times of Kāśakṛtsna and Pāṇini. Arthur A. MacDonell opines that as Pāṇini uses the word yavanāni meaning the writings of the Greeks as explained by Kātyāyana, his probable date may be after the invasion of Alexander in BC 327. Another text of Aṣṭādhyāyī Sūtrapāṭha 4.1.49 indravaruṇabhavaśarvarudramṛḍahimāraṇyayavayavanamātulācāryāṇā-mānuk also supports the same. Hence the date of Pāṇini is circa 300 BC. If the word yavana is arrived from the Persian word yauna, then the ancientness of this usage may be extended upto 520 BC, i.e. the time of Darius the Great's (Darius I of Persia) conquests in India.
Ṛṣibhirbahudhā gītaṁ chandobhirvividhaiḥ pṛthak
Brahmasūtrapadaiścaiva hetumadbhirviniscitaiḥ b(Bhagavat Gīta 13.5)
Brahmasūtra is thus praised in Bhagavat Gīta and therefore it can be assumed that Brahmasūtra is older than Bhagavat Gīta. But some aver that there are common lines in both Brahmasūtra and Bhagavat Gīta. Such baseless averments are footed on the commentaries of Brahmasūtras. Whenever something is quoted to elaborate some idea in the commentary, they argue that such ideas originate from Gīta. Two examples are given below.
api ca smaryate (Brahmasūtra 2.3.45 Śaṇkara)
mamaivāṁso jīvaloke jīvabhūtaḥ sanātanaḥ (Bhagavat Gita 15.7)
yoginaḥ prati ca smaryate smārte chaite  (Brahmasūtra 4.2.21 Śaṇkara)
yatra kāle tvanāvṛttimāvṛttiṁ caina yoginaḥ
prayātā yānti taṁ kālaṁ vakṣyāmi bharatarṣabha  (Bhagavat Gita 8.23)
It is evident from the above that the original texts do not have any similarity. However it cannot be concluded that Brahmasūtra precedes the original Bhagavat Gita, on the ground that the original Bhagavat Gita had four chapters only and the remaining fourteen chapters were supplemented later. The mentioning of Brahmasūtra in Bhagavat Gita is in the thirteenth chapter. Therefore it can rightly be concluded that the time of Bādarāyaṇa is between the original Gīta and the completion of the thirteenth chapter of the present Bhagavat Gita.
The averment that the period of Bādarāyaṇa is after the birth of Buddha and Varddhamāna Mahāvīra on the ground that Bādarāyaṇa has criticized Buddhist and Jain philosophies, is also defective as there is not even a single syllable in the entire Brahmasūtras mentioning Buddha or Mahāvīra. The refutation of Buddhist and Jain thoughts was only the contribution of the commentators of Brahmasūtra. Moreover the Buddhist and Jain thoughts had a history of at least one thousand years prior to Buddha or Mahāvīra and therefore a remark on such original philosophies were quite natural too.
Thus it can be concluded that Bādarāyaṇa flourished circa 600 BC.
allnews thehindu hindustantimes timesofindia veekshanam keralakaumudi deshabhimani madhyamam memoware gutenberg bookyards mathrubhumi deepika mangalam manoramaonline